Clarified tables and improved their formatting
Signed-off-by: Jim Martens <github@2martens.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
95df9c3d31
commit
e7ebea9ae8
21
body.tex
21
body.tex
|
@ -869,9 +869,16 @@ detections. Therefore, it is interesting to see the performance
|
|||
of the tested variants with respect to these classes: persons, cars,
|
||||
chairs, and bottles. Additionally, the results of the giraffe class are
|
||||
presented as these are exceptionally good, although the class makes up
|
||||
only 0.7\% of the ground truth.
|
||||
only 0.7\% of the ground truth. With this share, it is below
|
||||
the average of roughly 0.89\% for each of the 56 classes that make up the
|
||||
second half of the ground truth.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||||
In some cases, multiple variants have seemingly the same performance
|
||||
but only one or some of them are marked bold. This is informed by
|
||||
differences prior to rounding. If two or more variants are marked bold
|
||||
they had the exact same performance before rounding.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[tbp]
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{rccc}
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Forward & max & Recall & Precision\\
|
||||
|
@ -897,7 +904,7 @@ only 0.7\% of the ground truth.
|
|||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
It is clearly visible that the overall trend continues in the individual
|
||||
classes (see tables \ref{tab:results-persons} through \ref{tab:results-giraffes}). However, the two vanilla SSD variants with only 0.01 confidence
|
||||
classes (see tables \ref{tab:results-persons}, \ref{tab:results-cars}, \ref{tab:results-chairs}, \ref{tab:results-bottles}, and \ref{tab:results-giraffes}). However, the two vanilla SSD variants with only 0.01 confidence
|
||||
threshold perform better than in the averaged results presented earlier.
|
||||
Only in the chairs class, a Bayesian SSD variant performs better (in
|
||||
precision) than any of the vanilla SSD variants. Moreover, there are
|
||||
|
@ -908,7 +915,7 @@ precision than average but lower recall values for all but the Bayesian
|
|||
SSD variant without NMS and dropout. Chairs and bottles perform
|
||||
worse than average.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||||
\begin{table}[tbp]
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{rccc}
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Forward & max & Recall & Precision\\
|
||||
|
@ -933,7 +940,7 @@ worse than average.
|
|||
\label{tab:results-cars}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||||
\begin{table}[tbp]
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{rccc}
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Forward & max & Recall & Precision\\
|
||||
|
@ -959,7 +966,7 @@ worse than average.
|
|||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||||
\begin{table}[tbp]
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{rccc}
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Forward & max & Recall & Precision\\
|
||||
|
@ -984,7 +991,7 @@ worse than average.
|
|||
\label{tab:results-bottles}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||||
\begin{table}[tbp]
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{rccc}
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Forward & max & Recall & Precision\\
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue