Added sections to help guide the reader through the introduction
Signed-off-by: Jim Martens <github@2martens.de>
This commit is contained in:
@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\chapter{Introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Motivation}
|
||||
|
||||
Famous examples like the automatic soap dispenser which does not
|
||||
recognize the hand of a black person but dispenses soap when presented
|
||||
with a paper towel raise the question of bias in computer
|
||||
@ -48,6 +50,8 @@ describes tasks where the network is supposed to identify the
|
||||
class of any given input. In this thesis, I will focus on
|
||||
classification.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Object detection in open-set conditions}
|
||||
|
||||
More specifically, I will look at object detection in the open-set
|
||||
conditions. In non-technical words this effectively describes
|
||||
the kind of situation you encounter with CCTV cameras or robots
|
||||
@ -104,6 +108,8 @@ auto-encoder, a novelty score is calculated. A low novelty
|
||||
score signals a known object. The opposite is true for a high
|
||||
novelty score.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Research question}
|
||||
|
||||
Given these two approaches to solve the explanation task of above,
|
||||
it comes down to performance. At the end of the day the best
|
||||
theoretical idea does not help in solving the task if it cannot
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user